An actual rock band that used real instruments

Beatles For Sale

How The Beatles: Rock Band Makes the Music Secondary to the Medium

Sep 18, 2009 By Aaron Passman Bookmark and Share

After enduring a summer of forced nostalgia for the 40th anniversary of Woodstocka cultural watershed that becomes less relevant each time the baby boomers regurgitate it with an over-inflated sense of self-importancewe've come back to a musical moment worth celebrating: Beatlemania.

 

At least as far as the media is concerned, the release of The Beatles: Rock Band video game (and new editions of the band's complete catalog) has generated the most sustained burst of modern Beatlemania since The Beatles Anthology aired on ABC in November 1995. While that documentary was roughly tied to Beatlemania's 30-year anniversary, the Rock Band frenzy is part of a much bigger and much more American ideal: capitalism.

 

The reissues and box sets will surely sell brisklynever underestimate the public's willingness to re-buy a Beatles product they already ownbut it's Rock Band that's destined to be the larger phenomenon. Despite prices ranging from $50 to $250, depending upon whether you're buying the bare bones or deluxe edition, the set is destined to be the season's must-have item and the year's most un-findable holiday gift. All of which is to be expected, but it ignores the larger shift that comes with introducing the next generation of Beatles fans to the music in an entirely new wayone that makes the music secondary to the medium.

 

Like so many others, as a kid discovering the band, if I wanted more Beatles, there was basically only one way to get it: the albums. So you went out and bought them and played them over and over, and everything else you heard seemed a little less special after that, because you knew the Beatles had done it first. (To this day the proper order of Revolver still feels slightly off to me, having fallen in love with the album after purchasing it on cassette with a rearranged tracklist). And if buying an album wasn't quite scratching that itch then there were tapes of rare recordings, the Anthology set, Live at the BBC, Past Masters, and more. But generally you got the music as it was originally meant to be heard.

 

Not anymore.

 

For the tweens and teens coming at many of these songs for the first time, Rock Band alters the context of those revelatory encounters, so that rather than actually experiencing the musicporing over it, listening with headphones, marveling at the sonic tricks and innovationsit's literally a game. The Cavern Club becomes something you've got to get through before you play Shea Stadium, "Eight Days A Week" has to be mastered before you get to "I Am the Walrus," and so forth.

 

In short, interacting with the music becomes more about using than listening.

 

There's nothing wrong with approaching a band from the standpoint of its singles and best-known tracksthat's how popular music has historically been marketed, after all. But when you bought the album you got not only the songs you knew you wanted, but the stuff you didn't know you wantedmuch of which was even better than the tracks you were familiar with.  

 

There's less surprise with Rock Band; the game comes pre-loaded with 45 songs from across their career, with another 31 available to download at $1.99 a pop. The game may well lead an entirely new generation to purchase Beatles discs and repeat the same experience of previous generations, but I'm not optimistic.

 

(To be fair, the entirety of Rubber Soul, Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band and Abbey Road make up the bulk of those 31 additional downloads, but buying them that way isn't really the same as buying the album, is it?)

 

After all, The Beatles were among the first rock groups to pioneer "the album," yet as a new brood of music fans wraps their heads around this material for the first time, that format appears to be on its way out, replaced by the ubiquitous 99-cent digital single.

 

As far as authentic visceral experiences go, making music ranks fairly near the top, but there's no way a game can truly replicate that, no matter how good the technology is. Even if you get the same hair-raising thrill at moments like the bridge of "Hello Goodbye" or those ringing electric guitar notes at the close of "Strawberry Fields Forever," it's not the real thing. Call it the modern musical equivalent of a flight-simulator: sure, you may be "piloting the plane," but you're not feeling the G-force. Playing the songs as a game rather than as music takes away the mystery of "How did they do that?" and replaces it with "How do you do that?" and in turn progress to the next level.

 

Funnily, now that Beatlemania has risen again, Oasis, the Fab Four's greatest imitators, appear to have called it a day. Having ascended to fame around the same time as The Beatles Anthology, the Gallagher brothers seem to have finally given up after one fight too many and a career built on pilfering any Beatles idea they could grab.

 

Oasis make a great case against Rock Band: if Liam and Noel had had access to something similar they might not have been the band they became (whether that's a good thing or not is up for debate). If they'd been able to sit in the living room and knock back lagers while piddling around with buttons and plastic guitars, they would've merely reproduced exact copies of Beatles songs. Rather, it took using real instruments to work out the mechanics of musicthe hows and whys of what makes a great pop songfor the brothers to produce almost exact copies of Beatles songs. Everyone has their own opinion on Oasis, but it's pretty hard to argue with even their latter-day highlights such as "She Is Love," let alone bona fide classics like "Live Forever" and "Wonderwall."

 

Everybody knows the old saw about the Velvet Undergroundthey didn't sell many records, but everyone who bought one went out and started a band. Well everybody didand still doesbuy Beatles records and, for better or worse, a hell of a lot of bands were formed because of them. But those kids played real guitars and wrote their own songs and took drugs and over time turned into the Velvets and Bowie and The Ramones and more, which in the end moved rock music to where it is todaysomething a video game has a scant chance of doing.

 

Tomorrow's Beatlesor at least tomorrow's Oasismay be sitting in a basement somewhere thrashing out "Helter Skelter" on their plastic guitars, but if the game fails to move them beyond that then it will have wasted in its greatest opportunity.

 

Comments

Submit your comment

Name Required

Email Required, will not be published

URL

Remember my personal information
Notify me of follow-up comments?

Please enter the word you see in the image below:

Frank
September 21st 2009
8:02pm

Great post! Now, if we could only get John, Paul, George, and Ringo to play Bon Jovi’s “Livin’ on a Prayer,” we’d be all set! :)

richard
September 29th 2009
1:07am

This concept of the music becoming incidental to the colored-button context into which they’ve been first occured to me right after i heard that an Elliott Smith song (L.A.) was included in the newest Guitar Hero.  I was interested, and so got on youtube to look up this odd culture-clash.  I undoubtedly found some self-imposed Guitar Hero god, playing all the songs while videotaping them.  He’d clearly never heard of Elliott Smith, nor had he any interest in Elliott Smith as musician.  The song was a muscle-memory challenge for him to overcome.  A percentage for him to obtain (I believe he got 98%! wow!)  Obviously this was a personal affront to myself, who is in nothing but awe for the magic created in Elliott Smith’s music.  Clearly, Elliott Smith wasn’t writing music that would translate well to a 5-button guitar-shaped controller.  Reasonable of him.  It has the debilitating potential to dilute meaning out of music.  Beatles: Rock Band has given me this feeling 45 times over. 

I can’t wait for an Eraserhead RPG, or a Chinatown first-person shooter.

Tengu
October 14th 2009
12:14pm

Shock of shocks—you mean someone else’s experience of this music may not exactly mirror your own? What’s to become of the world? That hearing “Hey Bulldog” for the first time while playing Rock Band is somehow far inferior to hearing it first on CD/tape/vinyl, and that furthermore, said first-timers certainly won’t have the intelligence or wherewithal to say to themselves, “Hey, that’s not bad, perhaps I’ll seek out and purchase these recordings because they fill me with a strange joy”? You’re right—playing through Sgt. Pepper is not the same as listening to it. And of course, everyone is legally bound to experience in one way and one way only, thus the poor RB player is doomed to only have known it in its clicky colored button format, because as you know, CDs containing complete albums are no longer produced. Of course there’s no way a video game can “truly replicate” (think about that phrase for just a second, won’t you?) the experience of flying a fighter jet or fighting Muhammad Ali or shooting someone in the face or lining up in the godawful Wildcat formation…and yet still the games continue to roll out. They’re not meant to be perfect simulations, just entertaining approximations that allow you to play-pretend. But you knew that, of course. So if “Helter Skelter” on RB doesn’t inspire players to become great musicians, it’s somehow the fault of the video game? Wouldn’t it really be that “Helter Skelter,” the song, has “failed” to inspire, as if all who hear it (again, on CD/tape/vinyl only, of course) can’t help but become brilliant songwriters? Come off it all, and get over yourself. I’d like to think you’re not this pretentious and short-sighted, but I’m not optimistic.

idolhands
October 16th 2009
6:08pm

Its just a game…the times have changed…Period.

iicepack
October 17th 2009
5:32pm

so what? I listened to the tapes, and never wondered “how did they do that?” ... it’s clear you did, and maybe they won’t either. But how does that change anything?

Edward Wilfred
January 20th 2010
12:18pm

It’s just a game, calm down.  You should be glad that kids are hearing this music at all!!!

Alastair
January 30th 2010
8:28am

Hopefully no one believes that the Beatles pioneered the “album”. George Martin did that my friend. Not the Fab Four.
I don’t mean to be rude but the man is clearly not a Beatles fan.The Beatles started as a ‘singles only’ band my friend. Marketed to hell in teen mags.

Instead of putting the game and players down, you should be thinking to yourself ” thank god 10 yr olds are getting down to Beatles rather than lady gaga”.

Workholding
February 9th 2010
3:34pm

I think it is disappointing to see what has happened to the Beatle’s music over the years. They put so much work into their music and albums it is surprising that they would let them go to other parties who could exploit them. Everytime I hear one of there songs on a cheesy commercial it makes me cringe.

Credit
March 31st 2010
2:49am

Under what?

buy beats
July 10th 2010
2:49am

Would it not be great to have a concert where Paul and Ringo play together. It will be a treat for fans of all ages. Just the word Beatles means a lot to music lovers.