Cinema Review: The Light Between Oceans | Under the Radar Magazine Under the Radar | Music Blog for the Indie Music Magazine
Tuesday, May 21st, 2024  

The Light Between Oceans

Studio: Dreamworks
Directed by Derek Cianfrance

Sep 02, 2016 Michael Fassbender
Bookmark and Share

Tom (Michael Fassbender) returns home from World War I and immediately takes up work as a lighthouse keeper, a solitary occupation tailored for his battle-hardened soul. Threatening his life of brooding isolation, however, is the spritely Isabel (Alicia Vikander), who he meets before departing. Despite committing to melancholy and avoidance (everything he touches dies, he claims), Tom can’t deny Isabel’s enlivening presence. They quickly wed, and after a few months of post-marital bliss (Isabel’s fascination towards living on a drab island is satiated), they experience a major reversal: Isabel miscarries. They try again, only for the same result. With Isabel’s spirit diminished (and Tom’s touch of death prophecy come to fruition), a baby literally washes upon their lonely island in a rowboat. Also in the boat is a dead man, presumably the baby’s father, and Tom wants to report the discovery. But with a baby finally in Isabel’s arms, restoring her spirit, he decides against it, a decision that haunts him forever. After all, he may have stole yet another child from its mother.

The rest of The Light Between Oceans deals with the fallout from that decision, addressing themes of nurture and loyalty and providing some unexpectedly heavy moments in what could have been its own, better movie. Admittedly, the premise takes more than a typical act’s worth of screentime to establish, but too much of the opening hour is spent establishing Tom and Isabel’s happiness with unnecessarily extended scenes of the two frolicking about in nature. Director Derek Cianfrance made a name for himself with 2011’s Blue Valentine, a grounded and devastating observation of a marriage falling apart. His subsequent work—namely, The Place Beyond the Pines —was lackluster but at least could be lauded for its non-traditional approach. Not even that can be said for this film, which more closely aligns with the dense, traditional work of Anthony Minghella than the fresh, promising filmmaker teased by his early work.

Author rating: 3.5/10

Rate this movie


Submit your comment

Name Required

Email Required, will not be published


Remember my personal information
Notify me of follow-up comments?

Please enter the word you see in the image below:

There are no comments for this entry yet.